Jump to content

- - - - -

Building a new system? Lucid Hydra 200


  • You cannot reply to this topic
10 replies to this topic
  • Bard
  • Administrators
  • 174 posts
#1
Don't. Wait until lucid's hydra 200 drops and see if it lives up to the hype. No use wasting money now if you can spend the same thing a few months later and drop in your existing video card for linear scaling performance multi-core graphics.

Posted 12 November 2009 - 11:52 PM

Rule #76: No excuses. Play like a Champion!



  • Cham
  • Administrators
  • 2,191 posts
  • Name:Cham
  • Class:Warrior
#2
Looks neat.

Posted 13 November 2009 - 12:30 AM


  • Envy
  • Nova Officer
  • 2,018 posts
  • Locationym's house
  • Name:Envy
  • Class:Slayer
#3
But does it have any support yet? And if not, then when?

Posted 13 November 2009 - 12:46 AM


  • Cham
  • Administrators
  • 2,191 posts
  • Name:Cham
  • Class:Warrior
#4
From the sound of it, it's vendor neutral, meaning the only company that needs to support it is Lucid and the motherboard manufacturers. If MSI is in on it, I'm sure Asus and ABIT will follow. It will just depend on demand.

Don't be surprised if Nvidia does something to cock block though. If I were AMD, I'd embrace this technology as they're on their deathbed.

Posted 13 November 2009 - 12:51 AM


  • Bard
  • Administrators
  • 174 posts
#5
The way it works is: Lucid developed the chips, they license them to mobo manufacturers, and the mobo manufacturers put the chip on their boards. The cost added to said motherboards varies based on the number of pci-e lanes, but will probably be around $50-$70 according to Lucid's numbers.

The chip basically sits between the CPU and GPU (figuratively, and possibly literally in some cases). It takes commands sent to the GPUs and load balances them between however many GPUs there are in the system. The results are then handled again by the Hydra and finally sent to the primary display device.

This means that you can take the GTX 260 (or whatever you have) that is currently in your system.....and add it to your next system.....along with an ATI 58xx (or whatever you want).

Thus, your next upgrade could mean double your current graphics performance.


Edit: Also, The first mainstream board to come out with the Hydra 200 (that I know of) is the MSI (yuck, but oh well) Big Bang Fuzion (not to be confused with Big Bang Trinergy which doesn't have the Hydra), which is due out in Q1 of 2010.

Posted 13 November 2009 - 01:39 AM

Rule #76: No excuses. Play like a Champion!

  • raxe
  • Nova Member
  • 339 posts
  • Name:Paints
  • Class:Beserker
#6
Thanks for the info Bard.

Posted 13 November 2009 - 05:49 AM

I like children, I just never can finish a whole one, unless it's mine.

#7
I have actually been debating building a new rig, I think I will hold off now though :p sounds interesting to say the least.

Posted 17 November 2009 - 11:33 PM


  • Cham
  • Administrators
  • 2,191 posts
  • Name:Cham
  • Class:Warrior
#8
http://www.tomshardw...uzion,2769.html

Review of the Hydra setup.

Cliffs: SLI / Crossfire is still better. Which isn't surprising, as the Hydra chip surely adds some overhead.

Posted 26 October 2010 - 08:59 PM


  • Bard
  • Administrators
  • 174 posts
#9

Cham said:

http://www.tomshardw...uzion,2769.html

Review of the Hydra setup.

Cliffs: SLI / Crossfire is still better. Which isn't surprising, as the Hydra chip surely adds some overhead.

maybe. MSI was just the first company to make a board with the chip on it. Asus is starting to come out with hydra boards now. They have a really high end amd board right now with hydra. The one I'm interested in isn't out yet. It has a decent ati card on board, something like a 5770. So when you put a card in it will still get the benefit of the on board 57xx via the hydra.

The tech just needs a chance to mature I think. Also, nvidia are being douchebags about it from what I've read. Evidently they don't want video card mixing......racists.

Posted 27 October 2010 - 10:45 PM

Rule #76: No excuses. Play like a Champion!

  • Cham
  • Administrators
  • 2,191 posts
  • Name:Cham
  • Class:Warrior
#10
The problem is game support, not hardware support. Games aren't writing drives to take advantage of the tech since it's so niche.

The AMD board with the 5770 means dick if the game isn't going to support Hydra. There were several games that actually performed on par with a single card. Real world performance means more to mean then benchmarks in 3DMark.

Posted 28 October 2010 - 12:33 AM


  • Bard
  • Administrators
  • 174 posts
#11
It's lucid who needs to write better game profiles. Performance could change vastly in a single driver update. Lucid just needs to grow. Hopefully adoption by companies like Asus facilitates that. Games don't have to support hydra, hydra has to support games...if that makes sense.

edit: all of this doesn't really matter anyway. In the context of this thread it's not worth using in a new system. It's still something that may or may not develop in the next couple years though.

Posted 28 October 2010 - 03:51 AM

Rule #76: No excuses. Play like a Champion!





0 user(s) are reading this topic

members, guests, anonymous users